mirror of
https://github.com/TriliumNext/Notes.git
synced 2025-08-10 02:02:29 +08:00
test(server/utils): fix warnings and explicitly await timeLimit tests
This commit is contained in:
parent
13e72c5e0a
commit
08c32da0d2
@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ describe("#timeLimit", () => {
|
||||
}, 200);
|
||||
//rej("rejected!");
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(utils.timeLimit(testPromise, 1_000)).resolves.toBe(resolvedValue);
|
||||
await expect(utils.timeLimit(testPromise, 1_000)).resolves.toBe(resolvedValue);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("when promise execution rejects within timeout, it should return the original promises' rejected value, not the custom set one", async () => {
|
||||
@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ describe("#timeLimit", () => {
|
||||
rej(rejectedValue);
|
||||
}, 100);
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(utils.timeLimit(testPromise, 200, "Custom Error")).rejects.toThrow(rejectedValue)
|
||||
await expect(utils.timeLimit(testPromise, 200, "Custom Error")).rejects.toThrow(rejectedValue)
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("when promise execution exceeds the set timeout, and 'errorMessage' is NOT set, it should reject the promise and display default error message", async () => {
|
||||
@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ describe("#timeLimit", () => {
|
||||
}, 500);
|
||||
//rej("rejected!");
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(utils.timeLimit(testPromise, 200)).rejects.toThrow(`Process exceeded time limit 200`)
|
||||
await expect(utils.timeLimit(testPromise, 200)).rejects.toThrow(`Process exceeded time limit 200`)
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("when promise execution exceeds the set timeout, and 'errorMessage' is set, it should reject the promise and display set error message", async () => {
|
||||
@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ describe("#timeLimit", () => {
|
||||
}, 500);
|
||||
//rej("rejected!");
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(utils.timeLimit(testPromise, 200, customErrorMsg)).rejects.toThrow(customErrorMsg)
|
||||
await expect(utils.timeLimit(testPromise, 200, customErrorMsg)).rejects.toThrow(customErrorMsg)
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// TriliumNextTODO: since TS avoids this from ever happening – do we need this check?
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user